Like any practice — whether music, dance, surgery, or prayer — democracy requires repetition, discipline, failure, adjustment, and the willingness to try again.
Which raises a question: What role do the arts play in that rehearsal?
Not the arts as decoration or entertainment, though beauty and joy matter. Not even the arts only as protest, though protest matters too. But the arts as a civic technology. A way of seeing, imagining, and repairing things our political institutions were never designed to do alone.
Because the crisis we are living through is not only political. It is imaginative.
What democracy requires
Democratic life depends on citizens who can imagine each other’s humanity, hold complexity without collapsing into certainty, and encounter difference without immediately turning it into threat.
That capacity is being eroded deliberately, by forces that benefit from a public unable to imagine beyond itself.
The arts remain one of the last places where those capacities are still practiced.
A novel puts you inside another person’s experience. A play asks strangers to sit together inside tension. A poem can destabilize certainty in a single line.
This is not therapy. It is civic training.
The arts as civic infrastructure
The creative response to democratic fracture cannot only be reactive. But artists embedded in communities over time — as teachers, conveners, storytellers, and witnesses — build something beyond protest. They build civic infrastructure. The kind that holds when institutions fail.
An individual artist working in isolation creates something beautiful. Artists working in concert across disciplines and generations, with intention and accountability, become a civic force.
Not because artists are morally superior, or because creativity magically solves politics. But because creative practice develops the habits democratic life depends on: attention, imagination, collaboration, revision, and the ability to remain inside uncertainty long enough for something new to emerge.
Creative intelligence is civic intelligence
What interests me is not another arts advocacy organization or think tank.
I am interested in a civic body of artists, writers, filmmakers, architects, musicians, designers, and storytellers who believe creative thinking belongs inside public life itself.
Not as ornament. Not as content. As a necessary democratic force.
People who help shape the social imagination of the future rather than wait permanently on the sidelines for something to respond to.
Democracy does not survive on laws alone. It survives on the human capacities beneath those laws: the ability to imagine, listen, interpret, revise, and remain human in the presence of difference.
And, what a surprise … those are also artistic capacities.
If any part of this resonates with you, if you believe your creative mind belongs inside civic life, I want to talk with you.
A version of this post was originally published on Substack, May 31, 2026
Banner image: Untitled (band practicing in gymnasium), Photo 1943 by John Deusing, Harvard Art Museums/Fogg Museum, Transfer from the Carpenter Center for the Visual Arts, American Professional Photographers Collection, Noncommercial use permitted.
